Can an offshore company own a local subsidiary

Can an Offshore Company Own a Local Subsidiary?

An offshore company can legally own a local subsidiary in many jurisdictions, but compliance rules vary significantly.

An offshore company local subsidiary structure is a common setup in global business.
It involves an offshore entity owning a subsidiary in another jurisdiction. Jurisdictions like Seychelles or BVI are often used for the parent company. The structure is legal but requires careful tax and compliance planning. Laws vary by country, so obligations must be understood on both sides.

Legal Framework for Ownership

In general, jurisdictions permit foreign companies, including offshore entities, to hold shares in local corporations. This means that an offshore company local subsidiary can be formed in countries like the United States, Canada, the UAE, or even within the EU, provided it adheres to applicable disclosure and regulatory frameworks.

Ownership and Control Disclosure

One of the most important legal aspects of forming an offshore company local subsidiary is ownership transparency. Many jurisdictions now mandate disclosure of the ultimate beneficial owner (UBO). This can complicate efforts to retain privacy through nominee structures.

According to the OECD, more than 100 countries have adopted beneficial ownership reporting laws. In the UK, for example, a foreign-owned local company must file information on its controlling persons in the PSC Register. The European Union requires similar disclosures under the Fifth Anti-Money Laundering Directive (5AMLD).

Tax Implications and Substance Rules

From a tax planning standpoint, having an offshore company local subsidiary can be beneficial. Profits can be repatriated to the offshore parent as dividends, management fees, or royalties. However, local tax authorities may apply withholding taxes or require transfer pricing documentation to prevent base erosion. In some cases, especially when the offshore jurisdiction is considered a “non-cooperative tax jurisdiction,” the local subsidiary may face higher scrutiny. For example, under OECD BEPS Action 5, jurisdictions like the Seychelles and Belize have introduced economic substance laws for companies earning passive income.

The Managing Director at LexisNexis Risk Solutions, stated during a panel on global corporate transparency at the International Bar Association (IBA):

Owning a local subsidiary through an offshore company is legally permitted in most jurisdictions. The challenge is not in setting it up but in maintaining compliance, especially under today’s transparency-focused regulatory environment.

Practical Use and Legal Implications

Using an offshore company local subsidiary structure is a common and legal method for international expansion. Typically, the offshore parent company is formed in jurisdictions like Seychelles, Belize, or the British Virgin Islands, while the subsidiary operates in a higher-tax or regulated jurisdiction such as the UK, the UAE, or Singapore. This setup enables companies to separate global ownership from local operations. However, such a structure is only sustainable if managed with full compliance, transparency, and proper legal documentation.

In this structure, the local subsidiary handles operations, while the offshore company holds assets or revenue. Without economic substance, tax authorities may ignore the offshore entity.

Across multiple jurisdictions, transparency rules now require disclosure of the ultimate beneficial owner (UBO). Even if the offshore jurisdiction does not impose public filing obligations, the country where the subsidiary is formed often does. For example, a Seychelles IBC that owns a UK company must comply with the UK’s People with Significant Control (PSC) register. Similarly, in Germany and most of the European Union, the Fifth Anti-Money Laundering Directive mandates that beneficial ownership be recorded and available to authorities. 

Legal Capacity, Enforceability, and Cross-Border Strategy

For an offshore company local subsidiary structure to be legally effective, both the parent and the subsidiary must remain in good standing and fully recognized under the law. The offshore parent’s legal capacity, its ability to own assets, enter contracts, or take legal action, is automatically granted upon incorporation. However, this capacity is immediately lost if the company is struck off, deregistered, or declared inactive.

For example, if a Seychelles IBC owns a local subsidiary in the UAE, the offshore company must remain in good standing under the Seychelles International Business Companies Act, 2016 to continue exercising control. Should it be struck off, the local UAE entity may no longer be able to transfer shares, restructure its board, or sign enforceable agreements with third parties. This is not theoretical, courts in the UK, UAE, and even the Caribbean have ruled that contracts signed by a struck-off parent entity are null and void.

Enforceability is essential in any offshore company local subsidiary structure, especially during high-value transactions like M&A or licensing. Banks and investors require updated documents proving the offshore parent’s legal capacity. Missing filings or expired certificates can delay deals or render agreements unenforceable. Civil law jurisdictions are particularly strict on intercompany contract formalities. Banks also assess both the parent and subsidiary before approving accounts. They may request incorporation papers, shareholder lists, and proof of tax residency. Without clear structure and compliance, onboarding becomes difficult or denied.

Conclusion

Owning a local subsidiary through an offshore company is a legal and widely used strategy in international business. However, its success depends on proper structuring, ongoing compliance, and a clear understanding of cross-border legal obligations. From maintaining corporate capacity to navigating banking and disclosure requirements, every element of the offshore company local subsidiary must be carefully documented and managed. As global transparency and substance regulations continue to evolve, businesses must work with experienced providers – like OVZA – to ensure their structures remain compliant and operational. 

Frequently Asked Questions

Yes, it is legal in most jurisdictions. Countries such as the U.S., UK, UAE, and EU member states generally allow foreign and offshore companies to own local subsidiaries, as long as the structure complies with domestic regulations and ownership disclosure rules.

In most cases, yes. While offshore jurisdictions like Seychelles or Belize may protect UBO privacy, the country where the local subsidiary is formed will likely require full UBO disclosure under AML laws. For example, the UK mandates listing UBOs in the PSC Register.

Yes. Profits repatriated to the offshore parent may be subject to withholding taxes, transfer pricing rules, and other local compliance obligations. Jurisdictions considered “non-cooperative” may face higher scrutiny or additional tax burdens on their subsidiaries.

If the offshore parent loses good standing, its ability to control or act on behalf of the local subsidiary may be invalidated. Courts in multiple countries have ruled that contracts signed by struck-off entities can be unenforceable, impacting banking, ownership transfers, and more.

Nominees can still be used, but the ultimate beneficial owner must usually be disclosed to both the registered agent offshore and authorities in the country where the subsidiary is based. Nominees do not exempt you from legal transparency requirements. OVZA does not offer such services. 

Frequently Asked Questions

Yes, it is legal in most jurisdictions. Countries such as the U.S., UK, UAE, and EU member states generally allow foreign and offshore companies to own local subsidiaries, as long as the structure complies with domestic regulations and ownership disclosure rules.

In most cases, yes. While offshore jurisdictions like Seychelles or Belize may protect UBO privacy, the country where the local subsidiary is formed will likely require full UBO disclosure under AML laws. For example, the UK mandates listing UBOs in the PSC Register.

Yes. Profits repatriated to the offshore parent may be subject to withholding taxes, transfer pricing rules, and other local compliance obligations. Jurisdictions considered “non-cooperative” may face higher scrutiny or additional tax burdens on their subsidiaries.

If the offshore parent loses good standing, its ability to control or act on behalf of the local subsidiary may be invalidated. Courts in multiple countries have ruled that contracts signed by struck-off entities can be unenforceable, impacting banking, ownership transfers, and more.

Nominees can still be used, but the ultimate beneficial owner must usually be disclosed to both the registered agent offshore and authorities in the country where the subsidiary is based. Nominees do not exempt you from legal transparency requirements. OVZA does not offer such services. 

Disclaimer: The information provided on this website is intended for general reference and educational purposes only. While OVZA makes every effort to ensure accuracy and timeliness, the content should not be considered legal, financial, or tax advice.

Share this article
Written By

OVZA Legal Affairs

Copyright © 2025 OVZA
All Rights Reserved

Generate Citation

Related Posts

Send us a Message
Posts Form
CheckBox
Latest Posts
Can an offshore company own a local subsidiary

Can an Offshore Company Own a Local Subsidiary?

An offshore company can legally own a local subsidiary in many jurisdictions, but compliance rules vary significantly.

An offshore company local subsidiary structure is a common setup in global business.
It involves an offshore entity owning a subsidiary in another jurisdiction. Jurisdictions like Seychelles or BVI are often used for the parent company. The structure is legal but requires careful tax and compliance planning. Laws vary by country, so obligations must be understood on both sides.

Legal Framework for Ownership

In general, jurisdictions permit foreign companies, including offshore entities, to hold shares in local corporations. This means that an offshore company local subsidiary can be formed in countries like the United States, Canada, the UAE, or even within the EU, provided it adheres to applicable disclosure and regulatory frameworks.

Ownership and Control Disclosure

One of the most important legal aspects of forming an offshore company local subsidiary is ownership transparency. Many jurisdictions now mandate disclosure of the ultimate beneficial owner (UBO). This can complicate efforts to retain privacy through nominee structures.

According to the OECD, more than 100 countries have adopted beneficial ownership reporting laws. In the UK, for example, a foreign-owned local company must file information on its controlling persons in the PSC Register. The European Union requires similar disclosures under the Fifth Anti-Money Laundering Directive (5AMLD).

Tax Implications and Substance Rules

From a tax planning standpoint, having an offshore company local subsidiary can be beneficial. Profits can be repatriated to the offshore parent as dividends, management fees, or royalties. However, local tax authorities may apply withholding taxes or require transfer pricing documentation to prevent base erosion. In some cases, especially when the offshore jurisdiction is considered a “non-cooperative tax jurisdiction,” the local subsidiary may face higher scrutiny. For example, under OECD BEPS Action 5, jurisdictions like the Seychelles and Belize have introduced economic substance laws for companies earning passive income.

The Managing Director at LexisNexis Risk Solutions, stated during a panel on global corporate transparency at the International Bar Association (IBA):

Owning a local subsidiary through an offshore company is legally permitted in most jurisdictions. The challenge is not in setting it up but in maintaining compliance, especially under today’s transparency-focused regulatory environment.

Practical Use and Legal Implications

Using an offshore company local subsidiary structure is a common and legal method for international expansion. Typically, the offshore parent company is formed in jurisdictions like Seychelles, Belize, or the British Virgin Islands, while the subsidiary operates in a higher-tax or regulated jurisdiction such as the UK, the UAE, or Singapore. This setup enables companies to separate global ownership from local operations. However, such a structure is only sustainable if managed with full compliance, transparency, and proper legal documentation.

In this structure, the local subsidiary handles operations, while the offshore company holds assets or revenue. Without economic substance, tax authorities may ignore the offshore entity.

Across multiple jurisdictions, transparency rules now require disclosure of the ultimate beneficial owner (UBO). Even if the offshore jurisdiction does not impose public filing obligations, the country where the subsidiary is formed often does. For example, a Seychelles IBC that owns a UK company must comply with the UK’s People with Significant Control (PSC) register. Similarly, in Germany and most of the European Union, the Fifth Anti-Money Laundering Directive mandates that beneficial ownership be recorded and available to authorities. 

Legal Capacity, Enforceability, and Cross-Border Strategy

For an offshore company local subsidiary structure to be legally effective, both the parent and the subsidiary must remain in good standing and fully recognized under the law. The offshore parent’s legal capacity, its ability to own assets, enter contracts, or take legal action, is automatically granted upon incorporation. However, this capacity is immediately lost if the company is struck off, deregistered, or declared inactive.

For example, if a Seychelles IBC owns a local subsidiary in the UAE, the offshore company must remain in good standing under the Seychelles International Business Companies Act, 2016 to continue exercising control. Should it be struck off, the local UAE entity may no longer be able to transfer shares, restructure its board, or sign enforceable agreements with third parties. This is not theoretical, courts in the UK, UAE, and even the Caribbean have ruled that contracts signed by a struck-off parent entity are null and void.

Enforceability is essential in any offshore company local subsidiary structure, especially during high-value transactions like M&A or licensing. Banks and investors require updated documents proving the offshore parent’s legal capacity. Missing filings or expired certificates can delay deals or render agreements unenforceable. Civil law jurisdictions are particularly strict on intercompany contract formalities. Banks also assess both the parent and subsidiary before approving accounts. They may request incorporation papers, shareholder lists, and proof of tax residency. Without clear structure and compliance, onboarding becomes difficult or denied.

Conclusion

Owning a local subsidiary through an offshore company is a legal and widely used strategy in international business. However, its success depends on proper structuring, ongoing compliance, and a clear understanding of cross-border legal obligations. From maintaining corporate capacity to navigating banking and disclosure requirements, every element of the offshore company local subsidiary must be carefully documented and managed. As global transparency and substance regulations continue to evolve, businesses must work with experienced providers – like OVZA – to ensure their structures remain compliant and operational. 

Frequently Asked Questions

Yes, it is legal in most jurisdictions. Countries such as the U.S., UK, UAE, and EU member states generally allow foreign and offshore companies to own local subsidiaries, as long as the structure complies with domestic regulations and ownership disclosure rules.

In most cases, yes. While offshore jurisdictions like Seychelles or Belize may protect UBO privacy, the country where the local subsidiary is formed will likely require full UBO disclosure under AML laws. For example, the UK mandates listing UBOs in the PSC Register.

Yes. Profits repatriated to the offshore parent may be subject to withholding taxes, transfer pricing rules, and other local compliance obligations. Jurisdictions considered “non-cooperative” may face higher scrutiny or additional tax burdens on their subsidiaries.

If the offshore parent loses good standing, its ability to control or act on behalf of the local subsidiary may be invalidated. Courts in multiple countries have ruled that contracts signed by struck-off entities can be unenforceable, impacting banking, ownership transfers, and more.

Nominees can still be used, but the ultimate beneficial owner must usually be disclosed to both the registered agent offshore and authorities in the country where the subsidiary is based. Nominees do not exempt you from legal transparency requirements. OVZA does not offer such services. 

Frequently Asked Questions

Yes, it is legal in most jurisdictions. Countries such as the U.S., UK, UAE, and EU member states generally allow foreign and offshore companies to own local subsidiaries, as long as the structure complies with domestic regulations and ownership disclosure rules.

In most cases, yes. While offshore jurisdictions like Seychelles or Belize may protect UBO privacy, the country where the local subsidiary is formed will likely require full UBO disclosure under AML laws. For example, the UK mandates listing UBOs in the PSC Register.

Yes. Profits repatriated to the offshore parent may be subject to withholding taxes, transfer pricing rules, and other local compliance obligations. Jurisdictions considered “non-cooperative” may face higher scrutiny or additional tax burdens on their subsidiaries.

If the offshore parent loses good standing, its ability to control or act on behalf of the local subsidiary may be invalidated. Courts in multiple countries have ruled that contracts signed by struck-off entities can be unenforceable, impacting banking, ownership transfers, and more.

Nominees can still be used, but the ultimate beneficial owner must usually be disclosed to both the registered agent offshore and authorities in the country where the subsidiary is based. Nominees do not exempt you from legal transparency requirements. OVZA does not offer such services. 

Disclaimer: The information provided on this website is intended for general reference and educational purposes only. While OVZA makes every effort to ensure accuracy and timeliness, the content should not be considered legal, financial, or tax advice.

Share this article
Written By

OVZA Legal Affairs

Copyright © 2025 OVZA
All Rights Reserved

Generate Citation

Send us a Message
Posts Form
CheckBox

Related Posts